Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Big Daddy? by stupidevolution Big Daddy? by stupidevolution
Big Daddy Comic
Add a Comment:
 
:iconpempelune:
Pempelune Featured By Owner Sep 5, 2015  Student Writer
This got a name, it is called propaganda.

A better teacher would have answered the boy that:
- macro-evolution has been observed
- the "five beliefs" are not held by faith but are hypothesis which are constructed in accordance of the observations
- Richard Leakey's skull was an datation error that was quickly corrected
- All experts agree that Lucy was an Australpithecus afarensis (on the basis of anatomical differences, it is easy to see that Lucy cannot be a chimpanze)
- Fossils are dated using the exponential law of desintegration of radioelements contained within the fossil, and this law has been observed in laboratory
- The muscles attached on the tail bone are useless: in fact they are vestiges of the extensor muscle of the caudal vertebrae of the lower animals. 
- Losing an organ isn't opposed to evolution: it is a form of adaptation when the organ become useless (like was the case with the tail)
- Gluons are not a dream and have observed since 1979, like all the other atomic constituants.

As a final note, what I stated does not prove that God doen't exist (it can't be proved) but it is proof that science is true. 
However, that science is true does not meen that God doesn't exist, but merely that the Bible is not a litteral explanation of the world.
After, why would God give us the origin of the world?
He could decide that we have to search it for ourselves - his ways ware impenetrable...
Reply
:iconpioneeringauthor:
PioneeringAuthor Featured By Owner Dec 6, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
You just said that the "five beliefs" are not held by faith but are hypothesis... but a hypothesis itself is just a belief, even if it has some "evidence" for it. 

Furthermore---look at Lucy---it's bone fragments. We have no way of really putting them together, and some parts probably don't even go together anyway. So ignore Lucy and do not speak of her again, for she is a shattered mosaic, useless to science.

As for dating fossils, how do you know how  many elements were in it when it was first buried? You don't. You believe something and guess---that's the honest truth. Furthermore, an experiment was done where scientists watched lava cool and then dated it and the dating system said it was millions of years old---we all know that radiometric dating is flawed, we all do.

Dude, there is no such thing as a useless muscle---every time we think that, someone breaks something and needs a life-saving operation and the doctors realize it's useful. Furthermore, losing a body part is the opposite of evolution in a way---for if an animal has survived with that part for generations, why should it stop using it and why would it become useless and why would it then dissappear? If the animal is using it, it has no reason to lose it, according to evolution. Any animal that would stop using this part would probably die because it did not live like the others and probably would not be able to get food, or reproduce, or who knows what else. Furthermore, you have no idea what came before that tailbone, you only assume things. By the way, that tailbone is connected to the spine, so it protects the spinal chord, I am sure.


Furthermore, when has MACROevolution been observed? Never. Only in dreams and fossil fragments that don't really count because they are fragments.

Also, atoms are never observed because they are too small---we can use mathematics and experiments to assume what they look like, but the truth is that no microscope can truly observe them---the ones that "can" use mathematic formulas that could easily be flawed. Gluons are a dream at best.


Furthermore, the existence of hominids doesn't mean they are our ancestors---it simply means they might be real.


Anyway, have a lovely day, just sharing my opinions here.
Reply
:iconpempelune:
Pempelune Featured By Owner Edited Dec 7, 2015  Student Writer
A lot of what you say - including about fossil evidence - come from you not admitting that evidence-based hypothesis are more than belief. 
Yes they are belief but among all hypothesis thay are the ones that are the most supported by evidence (evidence having been proved of course). 
Just imagine I take an apple and make it fall. There is no way I can prove that it is gravity that cause the fall, and it could be God that is pulling the apple toward Earth for all we know.
But we have no evidence for this second hypothesis, and a lot toward the first, so that I can safely state that gravity is making my apple fall. 
Even the people who wrote this "Big Daddy" thing would agree with me - so it makes me quietly laugh when I read that God hold the atomic nucleus together. 

So there is lot of evidence that makes evolution more than a belief.
For exemple, if micro-evolution is possible, then macro-evolution is possible too: you are maybe familiar with the exemple of the italian wall lizard, which was introduced on a a croatian island in 1971. It shifted from being an insectivore to a herbivore (the original specie is unable to handle a vegetation-only diet). If a lizard can change alimentation, what stop it from a small adaptation, for exemple, in mating habit, making it impossible for the lizard to reproduce with the original lizards of Italy? And if this croatian lizard can no longer reproduce with the italian lizard then it is a new specie (definition of a specie). 

What I really don't understand is why creationist won't admit this. In what way is evolution such a challenge to their faith? Darwin WAS christian, not a devil on mission to stir christians away from the fold.
You can always believe, if you want to believe that humans is superior to other animals, that God gave us some subtle nudges during our evolution. Sure, that makes Genesis interpretation less literal, but nobody interpret literaly the Book of Revelations, why should it be different?
Reply
:iconpioneeringauthor:
PioneeringAuthor Featured By Owner Dec 7, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
Dude, no offense but think about what you said---how is a lizard changing its diet proof that it came from something that was not a lizard? Furthermore, there is more evidence against evolution than for it, if you choose to open your eyes.

I really don't want to have this argument right now because I've had it before and I know that most likely you shall ignore everything I say just like all the others I've debated with.

First, tell me this: if we cannot trust Genesis, why trust any part of the Bible? The word for "day" in Hebrew there meant literal 24 hour day, so if the world was not created in six literal 24 hour days like it says, how can we trust any of it? Furthermore, if we can't trust that, how can we trust the rest of the Bible? How can we trust that God will forgive us? Furthermore, if Evolution is real, then that means that death came before sin---why would God allow death before sin when death is the punishment for sin? IT cannot be possible. Either God made the world perfect or He did not make it at all. The truth is that Evolution is so popular because people don't want God to be real---no God means that they can do whatever they want, sleep with whoever they please, say whatever they wish, and nobody can stop them. That is the truth.


If you want more evidence for Creationism, you can go to searchcreation.org/

and type in anything you wish, and you will find many articles there. I'm done, good bye.
Reply
:iconpempelune:
Pempelune Featured By Owner Edited Dec 8, 2015  Student Writer
If a lizard can change its diet with micro-evolution - then it can change its mating habits with micro-evolution too. 
But if it changes its mating habits, then it can't reproduce itself with other lizards anymore: a new specie is born.

You could trust Genesis has being a metaphorical way to say a truth men just could't handle at the time (who could have understand big bang and evolution when the Bible was written, after all?), and accept other parts of the Bible - among which, the New Testament - as literal. "God will forgive us" is way easier to express in a way men of the antiquity could understand than the origins of the universe. 

To be perfectly honest, I'm an atheist myself, and I can tell you that I don't believe God exist just because it seems improbable to me that He could exist, not because life is more easy without a God. Not all atheist are amorals, you know.
Reply
:iconpioneeringauthor:
PioneeringAuthor Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
I told you: you won't listen. So I'm done. I'm done arguing with people---love you, but I'm done. If you want to learn more, you can look up the website I shared. I'm not going to argue with you though. When you want to learn without contradicting me, then come talk to me---I refuse to argue right now. I have too many things to do and I love people too much to be offending them too much, so love you, but good bye.

And for your info, either God is a liar or He is not---He talked about many things people could not understand until later, such as the water cycle, the concept of an ice canopy above the earth, how the stars move, and many things---so either God is right about creation or the Bible is a lie---you cannot have Evolution and God.

Bye bye, see you later, have a wonderful day, but I don't want this to be a blood bath, so good bye.

The pioneer with a heart for people and a thousand stories to tell ~+~
Reply
:iconimperator-zor:
Imperator-Zor Featured By Owner Aug 22, 2014
The Bible Reloaded and AronRa blow this out of the water
www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_CzP7…
Reply
:iconleonorachris:
LeonoraChris Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Haha. I still have this little comic, among the few others, somewhere.
Reply
:iconarchangel64:
ArchAngel64 Featured By Owner Jun 8, 2014
Actually Evolution Can Be Defined As Losing And Gaining Because a creatures evolution would want to lose bad traits and replace them with better ones.Thus Evolution is a process of Losing Bad Traits And enhancing good ones and if you want A good Example of Modern Evolution one merely has to look at Insects Such as Butterflies To see rapid changes in their wing designs.Also you should probably change the name of This from Big Daddy it has nothing to do with Big Daddies from Bioshock. Also if I may Suggest A Name for This I would Call it "Bible Reader calmly Explains Things while Professor Acts Like A total Fanatic How Ironic".
Reply
:iconwingdiamond:
WingDiamond Featured By Owner Nov 11, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Jack Chick is a Hack, a Liar, a Bigot and many more things (none of them any good) and should find himself in a prison cell next to Kent Hovind!
Reply
:iconprotofan58:
protofan58 Featured By Owner Jul 30, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
The religious side made no sense to me at all...
Reply
:iconmountaineer-kristoff:
That's because you weren't paying attention.
Reply
:iconcharons-keeper:
Charons-keeper Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2013
A good presentation. Although, falsifying one theory does not automatically confirm another. "Evolution is incorrect, i.e. creationism is true" does not really do it for me.
Reply
:iconmountaineer-kristoff:
Thank you for your courtesy.
Reply
:iconcleverun:
Cleverun Featured By Owner May 25, 2013  Student General Artist
There are NOT six basic concepts of evolution. It explains the origin of species and nothing more.
Nebraska Man fooled no one in the scientific community. The image was commissioned by a magazine not directly affiliated with any scientific journal, and was quickly debunked after publishing.
Gills are just one feature (I personally wouldn't use them as an argument because they aid breathing in the womb). The drawings are fraud, but they're not used as a reference point anymore. And it's not just human embryos. Many animal embryos have extraordinary similarities.
Just because muscles attach to the tailbone doesn't mean it isn't vestigial.
Those pelvises in the whales may not be useless, but it doesn't mean that it hadn't served one purpose earlier then changed it's function.
Losing something is NOT the opposite of evolution. It's a key part of the process.
Atoms have nothing to do with evolution.

...
My flame retardant jacket! I left it at home! :nuu:
Reply
:iconspeciesunkn0wn:
Speciesunkn0wn Featured By Owner May 17, 2013
MUWAHAHAHAHA! YESH!
Reply
:iconkadagasa:
kadagasa Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2012
Picture yourself in a boat on a river,
With tangerine trees and marmalade skies.
Somebody calls you, you answer quite slowly,
A girl with kaleidoscope eyes.!!!
Reply
:iconpulse232:
pulse232 Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Wait, you said because gluons have nether been observed nor measured, so they don't exist. By that logic God doesn't exist, as no one has seen him.
Reply
:iconyaoipotion:
yaoipotion Featured By Owner Nov 15, 2012
Is is disquieting how many favorable comments there are about this tract. The information it presents is not correct, and extremely out of date. Lying for Jesus is still lying, and sadly creationists will go to any lengths to push their beliefs. It speaks to a lack of quality education that some young people today have little or no critical thinking skills. Instead of regurgitating creationist pap, at the minimum, do a google search on, for examples, piltdown man, and nebraska man(facepalm). Science moves forward, and corrects mistakes, religion repeats the same fallacies over and over again. Hopefully "stupidevolution" and those like him will eventually mature enough to investigate the truth for themselves, and not just stay with the "god dun it" option. At 16 you know nothing..live long enough and you will realize how little any of us know for certain, but have attained enough wisdom to know that the search for truth is never ending, and not wrapped in a neat little package like a Jack Chick tract. If there is a God, or gods even, no doubt he/it/they shake their heads, if they possess such things, at the arrogance of portions of humanity who dare to think they know, or understand the mind of a deity, and that their gift of intelligence is so blatantly, and willfully squandered. I will not attempt to point out your flawed understanding of basic biological principles, or just how DNA works.. etc.. there are thousands of publications written by competent scientists that guide the curious to an unbiased understanding of such things. Ignorance of how the world really works is not bliss, it is self inflicted mental stagnation/retardation. smh



























































































































































































































































"
o
r
Reply
:iconakreon:
akreon Featured By Owner Nov 5, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
:iconfacepalmplz:

Reply
:icontherealmaestro:
TheRealMaestro Featured By Owner Nov 7, 2012
Seconded.
Reply
:icontransatlanticalien:
transatlanticalien Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2012  Student Digital Artist
its a plesure to meet u jack chick i luv ur work
Reply
:iconsatan-is-cool:
Satan-Is-Cool Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2012
The stupidity of creationists is almost unreal.
Reply
:iconmountaineer-kristoff:
I beg your pardon? I have seen more reason from Creationists than evolutionists. Plus the supporters of evolution are constantly rude and unpleasant.
Reply
:iconpempelune:
Pempelune Featured By Owner Sep 5, 2015  Student Writer
Thare are, aren't they? And what better proof of Creationism than this?
Reply
:iconmountaineer-kristoff:
Mountaineer-Kristoff Featured By Owner Sep 8, 2015
Sure! Sure, I would be pleasured!
Reply
:iconmarmot-of-doom:
Marmot-of-Doom Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I'm sorry, but I did some research and I couldn't find any reference saying that Lucy was just a chimpanzee, if this was the case then she wouldn't be classified under the genus "Ausralopithecus" but under "Pan" like all the other chimpanzee species. And her pelvis as well as fossils of other members of her kind show that A. afarensis was very well adapted for bipedal walk, unlike any chimpanzee.
The supposedly 212 million year old human skull turned out to be, after more advanced dating methods have been used on the rock, a 2 million year old skull of an earlier genus. This also explains why I couldn't find any article about an supposedly over 200 million year old human skull, which would naturally attract quite some attention, wouldn't it?
The dating of rocks and the dating of fossils are two independent processes, otherwise we couldn't know the age of rock layers where no fossils have been found, which are actually very rare.
Neither the human tail bone nor the whales pelvis are vestigial... so what? One aspect of evolution is that organs, which once had a purpose but would seem useless now, change over time and get recycled into something else, according to what the organism needs for its current anatomy and lifestyle. The human tail for example once helped us keeping balance during climbing, over time it got reduced to what now helps us keeping our inner organs in place and is crucial for bipedal walking.

To make is short, the author of this comic clearly doesn't know what he is talking about.
Reply
:iconarmondikov:
Armondikov Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2013
Whoa there! You're not supposed to do research!! You're supposed to accept this as true! Just accept it. don't prove it. Just accept. And buy. Buy the books, the DVDS, the pamphlets, donate to creationist institutions, pay entry to the Creation Museum. Just anything but this "research" you talk of!

:stab:
Reply
:iconmarmot-of-doom:
Marmot-of-Doom Featured By Owner Jan 26, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ok, I keep that in mind ;)
Reply
:iconmarmot-of-doom:
Marmot-of-Doom Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Oh, and if Jesus is holding all things together he is doing a pretty shitty job, considering that the whole universe is drifting apart...
Reply
:iconbrony4:
Brony4 Featured By Owner Apr 12, 2013
There is no point to life without free will, God knows that better then anyone. If we were all made perfect then we would be just robots not truly living. This world is mean to be a testing ground if we choose to fail in one way or another that is our own problem not God's.

Also off topic this comic is bullshit on so many levels. It is clear that the creation story is metaphorical.
Reply
:iconmarmot-of-doom:
Marmot-of-Doom Featured By Owner Apr 13, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Well, no one simply "chooses" to fail in life, it comes largely from uneven chances, that's also a reason why God's "testing ground" is everything but fair.
Reply
:iconr55:
R55 Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2012
As a Christian myself, I'm really at odds with most of Jack Chick's stuff. Most of this has to do with poor scholarship, bizarre theology (i. e. KJV-Onlyism), and conspiracy theories.
Reply
:iconpenguinton:
Penguinton Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2012  Student Traditional Artist
Chick did one on KJV-onlyism? o.O"

Yeah I have the same problem with Chick tracks. They can go in some weird directions.
Reply
:iconr55:
R55 Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2012
No, he buys into KJV-onlyism, along with other conspiracy theories.
Reply
:iconpenguinton:
Penguinton Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2012  Student Traditional Artist
Yeah that's Chick for you...
Reply
:icon8manderz8:
8manderz8 Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I'm just wondering, do you have permission from the publisher to share this? I noticed you hid my comment before, but I thought I'd ask again since I didn't get an answer.
Reply
:iconingodzhandz:
InGodzHandz Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2012  Professional Photographer
I wish I could be that smart in real life.
Reply
:iconingodzhandz:
InGodzHandz Featured By Owner Sep 6, 2012  Professional Photographer
Very intelligent and very well done!
Reply
:icongirlfrumnever:
girlfrumnever Featured By Owner Sep 5, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Very well presented!! :)
Reply
:iconkenliano:
Kenliano Featured By Owner Sep 4, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Interesting!
Reply
:iconwindwings15:
WindWings15 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Student General Artist
Epic Sauce!
Reply
:icontsunnee:
tsunnee Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ok. That was boss.
Reply
:icontheedgerocks13:
theedgerocks13 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I love this soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much!
Reply
:iconcrystallace:
CrystalLace Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
:heart:
Reply
:iconstaryumaniac:
StaryuManiac Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
:D
Reply
:icondeathbewithyou:
deathbewithyou Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012   Writer
Wow! This is amazing!
Reply
:iconkawaiirox:
kawaiirox Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I love this. I hope my Earth science class would be like this...
Reply
:iconkitty910:
kitty910 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012
Oh how I wish I could put this in the faces of so many people in my own school. A big ole Amen to this!
Reply
:iconlockdown333:
Lockdown333 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2012  Student Digital Artist
Amen!!
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
July 30, 2012
Image Size
2.1 MB
Resolution
496×5719
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,612 (1 today)
Favourites
77 (who?)
Comments
82
Downloads
13
×